Cultural impact

Preventing socially unacceptable disruption: the impact of startups on local culture

Preventing socially unacceptable disruption: the impact of startups on local culture

We’re all being asked to consider environmental impact these days, but is ‘cultural impact’ also something that startups should be expected to care about?

Innovation is often characterised by the phrase ‘out with the old, in with the new’. The associated process was once more commonly described as ‘modernisation’, often seen as being in opposition to the preservation of tradition.

Some traditions which once enjoyed broad popular support, such as slavery, have been successfully abolished with no subsequent public backing for their ‘cultural preservation’ in any form other than as grizzly museum exhibits intended to act as salutary reminders.

Other traditional ‘marks of culture’, such as ‘the architectural character of a historic town centre’ are far less likely to generate such universal consensus regarding the desirability of potential modernisation.

In the light of widespread support for innovation as a means of addressing both the current financial crisis (by providing jobs) and also future needs (by providing more sustainable technologies) how should we pre-emptively consider the impact of innovation upon our current culture and cultural heritage?

We need to be careful not to restrict ourselves (in answering this question) to issues such as ‘the built environment’: culture also includes such things as local traditional activities, personal and group behaviour, language and attitudes.

In order to encourage startups to conduct the cultural equivalent of an ‘environmental impact assessment’ there would need to be an easily accessible set of resources which would enable someone considering proposing an innovation project to know what the local ‘cultural environment’ was.

This is not to say that the introduction of ‘cultural custodianship’ should necessarily precipitate a whole new level of bureaucracy. It could simply just comprise a socially curated document (a ‘wiki’ consisting of the detailed ‘cultural landscape’ in an agreed standard format) for every location.

For relatively small-scale startup projects, a ‘cultural impact assessment exercise’ (based upon consultation of the cultural landscape document) could be reduced to nothing more burdensome than preparing an appendix (but hopefully not without skimping on the necessary research) to the proposed venture’s business plan, which would demonstrate commendable due diligence in an often overlooked aspect of corporate social responsibility.

To help towards encouraging innovation-based cultural impact assessment, can anyone suggest helpful examples of ‘cultural impact assessment failure’, where innovations have produced adverse results which could have been prevented or mitigated if cultural impact assessment had been conducted in advance?

Posted in Green Tech, Innovation & Strategy, Investment, Startups, Technology

Tags:

View a print friendly format web page for this article by clicking on the printer icon: Print This Post
(please note, the article itself will be included in this page, but not any comments below the article, or any story teasers to the right of it, please also note that videos may be replaced by a still image that may or may not print depending on your browser settings)

One Response to “Preventing socially unacceptable disruption: the impact of startups on local culture”

  1. Jimmy Cathey says:

    I can think of many examples but two stand examples stand out. First, the automotive industry. It might seem benign and pointless to mention but the introduction of GPS technology as a navigational tool for social destinations has all but eliminated the concept of interpersonal communication when it comes to talking about destination. In other words you do not have to ask for directions any longer which in turn could have lead to new social relationships. Now you just click and go. No need to talk to anybody. Where is the love?

    Second and more profound is the concept of the managed care case management database in social services. All but gone are the days when social workers and health care providers discussed cases. now you plug in a formula and service many clients from a far. There was a time when you could not complete as case unless you had first hand clinical information which was a direct result of a face to face contact. Today you can plug keywords into a data base and voila, you have a diagnosis. What will all of those social workers ans case managers do who could once upon a time tell you why one person had a diagnosis that was only evident in a controlled environment while another might have the same diagnosis that was only evident when social qualifiers were present…got meds?

Comment on this article